Human Conflict Project

All events · Conquest and the Slave Trades

The Ottoman Iskan: Forced Settlement of Nomadic Tribes

c. 1691–1750 · Middle East & North Africa

Displacement
Displaced
150,000
Ottoman settlement registers (iskan defterleri) list tribes and households rather than individuals. The 1690s Raqqa programme assigned tens of thousands of households from the Boz Ulus, Yeni Il, Danismendli and Afshar confederations; at conventional household multipliers this implies well over 100,000 people, and the programme was repeated for decades because tribes returned to their pastures. The figure given is an order-of-magnitude reading of those registers, as analysed by Ottoman historians including Cengiz Orhonlu and Yusuf Halacoglu.

Open on the interactive map →

What happened

From 1691 the Ottoman government made the settlement of pastoral tribes a systematic policy, ordering named confederations to occupy fixed villages on depopulated land, above all along the Euphrates around Raqqa, and holding tribal leaders responsible for keeping their people there. The stated aims were to end raiding on caravan routes and settled villages, to bring nomads onto the tax registers, and to repopulate abandoned districts. Enforcement was uneven: many tribes fled back to their highland pastures and were ordered south again in successive decrees through the eighteenth century, and settlement in the malarial Euphrates lands carried heavy mortality. A parallel and better-documented campaign, the Firka-i Islahiye of 1865, used a reform army to settle tribes in Cukurova and the Amanus. The policy is one of the clearest early-modern instances of a state moving populations to make them legible and taxable rather than to punish them.

Parties

The Ottoman state ordered Turkmen, Yoruk and Kurdish tribal confederations to settle in designated villages, chiefly in the Raqqa region and Cukurova

Disputed

Ottoman historians disagree over how much of the settlement policy was ever enforced in practice and how far the registers describe intentions rather than accomplished moves.

The denominator

Ottoman registers record the named Turkmen, Yoruk and Kurdish confederations as taxable households and tent-groups assigned to specific villages, not as a counted population, and the coverage of the iskan decrees shifted across six decades between Raqqa, Cukurova and western Anatolia. Sixteenth-century estimates that roughly a quarter of Anatolia's population was nomadic cannot safely be carried forward to 1700.

Where the baseline comes from

On the death toll

No death toll was recorded. Ottoman documents and later scholarship note high mortality among tribes settled in the malarial Euphrates plains, and punitive expeditions against tribes that fled, but neither was counted.

Movements mapped

Countries touched, on present-day borders

Syria, Turkey

Sources

This entry rests only on reference, press or open-edited sources. Treat its figures as indicative and follow the links before relying on them.
← EarlierThe Great Migrations of the Serbs from Ottoman Territory to Habsburg Lands Later →Mawlay Isma'il's Enslavement of Black Moroccans for the 'Abid al-Bukhari